The development of collaborative
digital software has maximised efficiency in the design process, ultimately
enabling effective mock up testing and scripting to be achievable in one
program. This ensures that larger projects are, “automatized, [as] we cannot have a piece of software written for each
type of design problem” [1]. The
manipulation of design increases manual labour as it, “would affect the whole geometry… down to these very last elements
[and] their machining programs” [2].
This then leads to the need to manually modify the concept in each program,
therefore, further complicating the design process. It has to be understood
that, “the future of architecture is
unreadable” [3], as designers move forward with a collaborative mindset
where, “contemporary free forms are called into considerable question when they
become cliché and sacrifice the past to the advantage of an absolute present” [4].
To cater for enriching technical ingenuity and cultural and sociological
imaginations, the combining of programs increases time that could be spent
analysing context and experimenting with ideas. For example, a curved panelling
system that incorporates, “heterogeneous
elements as a challenge to be met by innovative design” [5], “is a general architectural problem that
leads to [a] complex manufacturing process” [6]. However, it can be avoided
through frequent software development and integration by designers.
________________
r e f e r e n c e s
- [1] [2] [3] [4] [6] Cache, Bernard, "Toward an associative Architecture", in Digital Tectonics edited by Neil Leach, David Tumbull & Chris Williams (2004): Pp. 108, 109.
- [5] DeLanda, Manuel, "Material Complexity", in Digital Tectonics edited by Neil Leach, David Tumbull & Chris Williams (2004): Pp. 21.
No comments:
Post a Comment